Seven transparent sheet materials, compared on the numbers that matter
The fast reference before the deep read. Split into four tables rather than one wide grid, because a twelve-column table is unreadable on any screen.
The fast reference before the deep read. Split into four tables rather than one wide grid, because a twelve-column table is unreadable on any screen.
What you see and how much punishment it takes.
| Material | Light transmission | Impact resistance | Scratch resistance | Max service temp. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cast acrylic (PMMA) | 92% | Low — brittle, cracks | Good | 70–80 °C |
| Extruded acrylic | 92% | Low — slightly more brittle than cast | Good | 65–75 °C |
| Polycarbonate (PC) | 88–90% | Very high — ~200× acrylic | Poor without hard coat | 115–125 °C |
| Polystyrene (PS) | 88–90% | Low — very brittle | Poor | 65–75 °C |
| PETG | 85–88% | Medium-high — tough, deforms rather than cracks | Fair | 65–70 °C |
| Clear rigid PVC | 80–85% | Medium | Fair | 55–60 °C |
| Soda-lime glass | 90–91% | Very low — shatters | Excellent | 150 °C+ |
How each one ages, and what attacks it.
| Material | UV / yellowing | Alcohol resistance | Solvent resistance | Typical outdoor life |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cast acrylic | Yellows gradually; UV grade extends it | Good — survives wipe-down | Poor — acetone and MEK attack it | 3–5 years with UV grade |
| Extruded acrylic | Similar to cast, slightly faster | Good | Poor, and stress-cracks more readily | 2–4 years |
| Polycarbonate | Yellows notably within 2–3 years unless UV-coated | Fair — repeated exposure clouds it | Attacked by ketones and chlorinated solvents | 2–5 years with UV coat |
| Polystyrene | Yellows quickly | Poor — crazes | Very poor | Not recommended |
| PETG | Good; less yellowing than PS | Good | Fair — better than acrylic | 2–3 years |
| Clear rigid PVC | Good, but discolours with heat | Good | Fair | 3–5 years |
| Glass | None | Excellent | Excellent | Indefinite |
Whether we can cut, bend, polish and bond it — this is where most material decisions actually get made.
| Material | Machining | Heat bending | Solvent bonding | Polishing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cast acrylic | Excellent — clean chips, holds tolerance | Excellent, 150–170 °C | Excellent — near-invisible joints | Excellent — diamond or flame |
| Extruded acrylic | Good, but stress-cracks around holes | Good, narrower window | Fair — joints show more | Fair |
| Polycarbonate | Good — needs sharp tools, tends to melt | Possible but difficult, needs drying | Poor — solvent bonding unreliable | Fair — hard to get optical finish |
| Polystyrene | Fair — chips easily | Good | Good | Fair |
| PETG | Fair — gummy, clogs tools | Good | Fair | Poor — does not polish clear |
| Clear rigid PVC | Good | Fair — narrow window | Good with specific solvents | Fair |
| Glass | Not applicable — cut and edge-ground only | Not possible | UV adhesive only | Factory edge only |
| Material | Relative cost | Use it when |
|---|---|---|
| Cast acrylic | Baseline | You need clarity plus machined or bent geometry. This is the default for 80% of our work. |
| Extruded acrylic | 10–20% cheaper | Flat, unpolished parts where nobody inspects the edge and cost is the driver. |
| Polycarbonate | 2–3× acrylic | Something is going to hit it. Guards facing swarf, machine windows, vandal-prone panels. |
| Polystyrene | 20–30% cheaper | Indoor display where cost dominates and life is short. Rarely worth the savings. |
| PETG | 1.2–1.5× acrylic | You need toughness plus solvent resistance and do not need optical clarity. |
| Clear rigid PVC | 1.1–1.4× acrylic | Chemical environments, or where fire rating matters. Not for optical work. |
| Glass | Varies widely | Scratch resistance, heat, or permanence outweigh weight and breakage risk. |
| If the part is… | Use |
|---|---|
| A retail display, machined and polished | Cast acrylic |
| A flat sign or panel, cost-sensitive | Extruded acrylic |
| A guard facing flying debris | Polycarbonate |
| Bent and bonded into a shape | Cast acrylic, annealed if thick |
| Cleaned with aggressive solvents | PETG or clear PVC — not acrylic |
| Autoclaved or exposed above 90 °C | Glass or a high-temperature engineering plastic |
| Outdoors for more than five years | UV-stabilised acrylic, or glass |
| Scratch resistance is the priority | Glass, or hard-coated polycarbonate |
Generally safe swaps: cast for extruded on flat unpolished work (cheaper, slightly worse edge); PETG for acrylic where optical clarity is not critical and toughness is.
Swaps that usually fail: polycarbonate in place of acrylic where you need polished optical edges — it does not polish clear. Acrylic in place of polycarbonate in an impact application — it will crack. Glass in place of acrylic where weight or breakage is the reason you chose plastic.
If you are substituting a material on an existing approved design, tell us what the original was and why you are changing it. The failure mode is usually in the reason for the change, not in the new material.
Send the drawing and a sentence about the operating conditions. The material choice usually follows from two facts: what hits it, and what cleans it.